gfxgfx
 
logo
 
gfx gfx
gfx
975762 Posts in 138935 Topics by 6360 Members - Latest Member: TattooedYorkie October 01, 2024, 10:36 AM
*
gfx* Home | Portal | Forum | Merchandise | Help | Login | Register | gfx
gfx
RADBMX.CO.UK  |  BMX General  |  BMX Chat  |  dont you think...
gfx
gfxgfx
 

Author Topic: dont you think...  (Read 710 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline meticulous

  • Berm Worm
  • ***********
  • Posts: 9509
  • Rated:
dont you think...
« on: November 19, 2008, 06:04 PM »
redline built pretty much middle of the road frame and forks back in the early eighties, with not very well thought out geometry (forks angled too far forward, and seat post tube too laid back), but they came up trumps with the crank set, whats all that about? one of the cheapest framesets with one of the most expensive crankset, though i never saw a redline crankset on a redline frame in a shop window!!! :-\
R.I.P  O.M. Far short of the finish line...

Offline kev-s

  • 900 Air
  • ********
  • Posts: 3195
  • I bought a site tag and my girth increased by 10%
  • Rated:
Re: dont you think...
« Reply #1 on: November 19, 2008, 06:34 PM »
some companies manage to make one great product but seem to fail on other stuff they do and get known for that one certain product , for example peregrine made superpros which were the best 48 spoke wheels to have in the 90's yet there frames, bars etc never managed the same, profile are well known for there cranks but how many of there frames do you see, it is strange that some companies can come up with great ideas once but cant repeat that in other areas

Offline ron burgundy

  • 900 Air
  • ********
  • Posts: 3968
  • Rated:
Re: dont you think...
« Reply #2 on: November 19, 2008, 10:19 PM »
redline built pretty much middle of the road frame and forks back in the early eighties, with not very well thought out geometry (forks angled too far forward, and seat post tube too laid back), but they came up trumps with the crank set, whats all that about? one of the cheapest framesets with one of the most expensive crankset, though i never saw a redline crankset on a redline frame in a shop window!!! :-\

...idiot









 ;)
« Last Edit: November 19, 2008, 10:21 PM by Ron '2elliot' Burgundy »
"Thanks for the Fish Fingers idea... I'm fooking loaded now!!!"

Offline Mattdub

  • Site Supporter
  • BMX Overlord
  • *
  • Posts: 16702
  • Rated:
Re: dont you think...
« Reply #3 on: November 19, 2008, 10:49 PM »
 ;D

I ( as well as quite a number of others ! ) won lots of races on a PL20 bitd , a very good F+F  ;) .
« Last Edit: November 20, 2008, 08:01 AM by Mattdub »

electobooty

  • Guest
Re: dont you think...
« Reply #4 on: November 19, 2008, 11:06 PM »
 :uglystupid2: :uglystupid2: ;D ;D

Offline MartyC

  • Berm Worm
  • ***********
  • Posts: 8755
  • Radder than a Rad thing on a Rad day; maybe?
  • Rated:
Re: dont you think...
« Reply #5 on: November 20, 2008, 09:04 AM »
Have to disagree with you there Sam, Redline made a range of bikes that covered the full spectrum of BMX.  Early Redlines and the PL range in particular were fantastic bikes and the PL20 Carrera was the top dogs  :4_17_5:.  The MXII was a much copied frame and fork combo and was a great ride to boot  :buck2:.


Better to crash and burn than fade away

Offline meticulous

  • Berm Worm
  • ***********
  • Posts: 9509
  • Rated:
Re: dont you think...
« Reply #6 on: November 20, 2008, 09:24 AM »
oh! ok! it seems i am shot down, :2gunsfiring_v1:

 i was referring to the mx11 as i dont recall seeing anyone with a pl20, i think we had nothing but mx11's around here, and i had one myself, maybe that was a lower end speck frame and forks compared to the pl20, no offence intended... :daumenhoch:
R.I.P  O.M. Far short of the finish line...

Offline OrgasmDonor

  • Berm Worm
  • ***********
  • Posts: 12037
  • I got the sauce for beef butterflies
  • Rated:
Re: dont you think...
« Reply #7 on: November 20, 2008, 09:50 AM »
redline built pretty much middle of the road frame and forks back in the early eighties, with not very well thought out geometry (forks angled too far forward, and seat post tube too laid back), but they came up trumps with the crank set, whats all that about? one of the cheapest framesets with one of the most expensive crankset, though i never saw a redline crankset on a redline frame in a shop window!!! :-\

...idiot

 ;)

 :2funny:

i know where your coming from with the frame angles of the earlier stuff, but man, the pedigree n heritage speaks for itself and the frame geometry was well sorted and much more aesthetically pleasing by the time the PL's came out, hutch were the complete opposite, nice frames, fookin shite cranks! :LolLolLolLol:
« Last Edit: November 20, 2008, 09:58 AM by OrgasmDonor »

Offline ron burgundy

  • 900 Air
  • ********
  • Posts: 3968
  • Rated:
Re: dont you think...
« Reply #8 on: November 20, 2008, 06:17 PM »
oh! ok! it seems i am shot down, :2gunsfiring_v1:

 i was referring to the mx11 as i dont recall seeing anyone with a pl20, i think we had nothing but mx11's around here, and i had one myself, maybe that was a lower end speck frame and forks compared to the pl20, no offence intended... :daumenhoch:

...just pulling your leg mate ;)

My old MXII was fantastic though... as is my MXIII...



 :)

"Thanks for the Fish Fingers idea... I'm fooking loaded now!!!"

Offline jT Racing

  • BMX Overlord
  • ***********
  • Posts: 17338
  • i like bikes. :/
  • Rated:
Re: dont you think...
« Reply #9 on: November 20, 2008, 06:31 PM »
love them levers, the bars look like they are sticking their thumbs up :LolLolLolLol:
ding dong

Offline meticulous

  • Berm Worm
  • ***********
  • Posts: 9509
  • Rated:
Re: dont you think...
« Reply #10 on: November 20, 2008, 07:15 PM »
here's my mx11, candy red f+f+bars....  :daumenhoch:



not quite finished though...
R.I.P  O.M. Far short of the finish line...

Offline ron burgundy

  • 900 Air
  • ********
  • Posts: 3968
  • Rated:
Re: dont you think...
« Reply #11 on: November 20, 2008, 08:01 PM »
Cool, what is the serial number?
"Thanks for the Fish Fingers idea... I'm fooking loaded now!!!"

Offline MartyC

  • Berm Worm
  • ***********
  • Posts: 8755
  • Radder than a Rad thing on a Rad day; maybe?
  • Rated:
Re: dont you think...
« Reply #12 on: November 21, 2008, 04:49 AM »
here's my mx11, candy red f+f+bars....  :daumenhoch:



not quite finished though...

FFS and you thought that was pants?  :LolLolLolLol:

Fooking cracking looking bike, get it finished  :knuppel2:  :LolLolLolLol:

Love those levers Bren, would like to get hold of a right hand one myself  ::).


Better to crash and burn than fade away

dialledbikes

  • Guest
Re: dont you think...
« Reply #13 on: November 21, 2008, 11:26 AM »
The head and seat angles do look very slack compared to today's bikes (even compared to some old school bikes), but they didn't hold Stompin Stu back!

Timmeh

  • Guest
Re: dont you think...
« Reply #14 on: November 21, 2008, 12:25 PM »
Are the 500a/ 600a Redlines rarer than most OS bikes?

There are (or seem to be) lots of mongooses, skyways, burners about...do RLs have less of a following on the OS scene?


Offline Mattdub

  • Site Supporter
  • BMX Overlord
  • *
  • Posts: 16702
  • Rated:
Re: dont you think...
« Reply #15 on: November 21, 2008, 12:47 PM »
Are the 500a/ 600a Redlines rarer than most OS bikes?

There are (or seem to be) lots of mongooses, skyways, burners about...do RLs have less of a following on the OS scene?



Generally there were more 500a/600a models around than PL20's bitd because they were the more affordable entry level models ( in 500a case ) . I saw quite a few 600a's bitd , well specced & priced for club racers .

For numbers Raleigh sold thousands of burners , they were very visible & lots of "normal" everyday bike shops had them . There were other options but back then not many knew of them , I got a Pro Star instead of a burner because I did'nt want the same as lots of others .   

RADBMX.CO.UK  |  BMX General  |  BMX Chat  |  dont you think...
 

gfxgfx
gfx gfx
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal