gfxgfx
 
logo
 
gfx gfx
gfx
975755 Posts in 138933 Topics by 6360 Members - Latest Member: TattooedYorkie September 23, 2024, 06:31 AM
*
gfx* Home | Portal | Forum | Merchandise | Help | Login | Register | gfx
gfx
RADBMX.CO.UK  |  Technical & Reference Section  |  Tech and Restoration  |  Help please with these spokes
gfx
gfxgfx
 

Author Topic: Help please with these spokes  (Read 684 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

The Burner King

  • Guest
Help please with these spokes
« on: April 16, 2008, 09:21 PM »
I have just sold these wheels to a new member on here and they were built and trued in a bike shop.

The member has been told by an expert that the spokes are not conventionally crossed and would be compromised with strength. As i understand there is a 3 cross and a 4 cross, I have had a look at other wheels and how they are crossed, and i cant see a lot of difference. Can someone tell me what cross these are from the pictures? I would say they are a four cross.

Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks Julian




snav69

  • Guest
Re: Help please with these spokes
« Reply #1 on: April 16, 2008, 09:28 PM »
Look like 4 cross to me  :daumenhoch:

Hmmmm after looking closer they look more like 3 cross  :)
« Last Edit: April 16, 2008, 09:46 PM by snav69 »

SaMAlex

  • Guest
Re: Help please with these spokes
« Reply #2 on: April 16, 2008, 09:32 PM »
They are 3 cross .... and there aint nothing wrong with 3 cross.
No strength compromise there, they are fine  :daumenhoch:



(maybe 4 cross is a tiny tiny bit stronger, but people use radial lace wheels (0 cross) and they are fine)

The Burner King

  • Guest
Re: Help please with these spokes
« Reply #3 on: April 16, 2008, 09:36 PM »
They are 3 cross .... and there aint nothing wrong with 3 cross.
No strength compromise there, they are fine  :daumenhoch:



(maybe 4 cross is a tiny tiny bit stronger, but people use radial lace wheels (0 cross) and they are fine)

Thank you. I have had about 25 sets of wheels done this way.

« Last Edit: April 16, 2008, 09:43 PM by The Burner King »

SaMAlex

  • Guest
Re: Help please with these spokes
« Reply #4 on: April 16, 2008, 09:41 PM »
Oh yes, I see. he is right. They are 3 cross, no problem.... but they arent "weaved" through the last lace. The first 2 crosses should go over-over and the last cross should go under (or the other way round).

Some wheels are build like this, its easier to do it, for sure. I dont think it will make a massive difference to the strength, as that comes from keeping the spokes tight.

Offline TwoBobRob

  • Site Supporter
  • 900 Air
  • *
  • Posts: 3713
  • Rated:
Re: Help please with these spokes
« Reply #5 on: April 16, 2008, 09:54 PM »
I built my wheels by mistake in this way - didnt send the spokes over and under.

I rode it for weeks without a problem before I could be arsed to rebuild them. And I do mean rode it.

As for a strength compromise, I'd say it would be neglegible. My understanding of it is that the spokes are likely to remain tight for longer if they are crossed over and under. Not that bigger a deal in my book.


wildwood1971

  • Guest
Re: Help please with these spokes
« Reply #6 on: April 16, 2008, 10:30 PM »
3 cross over - over - over lacing - yes it could be argued that they are not quiet conventional over - over - under - but the vertical tension comes from how tight the spoke is.

Theres nothing wrong with the lacing pattern whats so ever and they will stay true for ages.

paul  :daumenhoch:

The Burner King

  • Guest
Re: Help please with these spokes
« Reply #7 on: April 16, 2008, 10:31 PM »
Thanks guys, your help is much appreciated  :daumenhoch:

Offline Steve P

  • 900 Air
  • ********
  • Posts: 3045
  • Rated:
Re: Help please with these spokes
« Reply #8 on: April 16, 2008, 10:40 PM »
They look spot on to me ... nice wheels too  :daumenhoch:

Steve

RADBMX.CO.UK  |  Technical & Reference Section  |  Tech and Restoration  |  Help please with these spokes
 

gfxgfx
gfx gfx
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal