Author Topic: 2008 retro quadangle v's old school quadandle info and help (Read 8291 times)

Threaders · « **on:** June 06, 2011, 09:08 AM »

Hi. I am thinking of getting a 2008 retro quadangle as pictured below

I have never owned a quadangle before, and have only had experience with building old school bmx's so far. I have tried to get some pics of these built up with old school parts, to see what they look like and have only managed to find a couple shown here:

This was from an old ebay listing and despite the parts being a bit naff, the geometry looks a bit weird as well. Are there differences in the frame length between the older quadangles and the new ones??

This one looks more like it, but dont know if its a new school build or old school.
I guess my question is do these 2008 retro quads look good built up with old school parts and does anyone have some links of these newer ones built up??
Also seat post size states 25.5, so where do you get them from??
Am I best just to stick with old school frames??
Many thanks and your help will be appreciated

Munnyella · « **Reply #1 on:** June 06, 2011, 09:23 AM »

Heres my pub bike, 2009 complete, but i've out the changed wheels, bars, pedals tyres, chainring/spider, and seat/post since new.

This was it out of the box, apart from tyres, bars and pedals.

To be honest, i'm looking forward to falling off it so I can justify a re paint, when it'll go all white/ black, more old school look.

I cant justify the spend on a real one, this looks quite similar, and is a bit more `adult sized', so i'm happy with it.

Mine came from CRC for Â£280 complete (thats less than half the list price) earlier this year, which I thought was a bargain

Jon The Bassist · « **Reply #2 on:** June 06, 2011, 09:31 AM »

For riding - get the New Skool.
For showing - get the Old Skool.

Jaymz · « **Reply #3 on:** June 06, 2011, 10:18 AM »

this one was old schooled on the blackpool berm, took the lugs off and put on DC's and levers, swapped the cranks etc, looked the nuts

HEYWOOD BMX · « **Reply #4 on:** June 06, 2011, 12:03 PM »

Seatpost is 25.4mm and is the standard new school post size avail from any BMX shop.Poss too flexy for serious riding but just my view.I just don`t get why people chop the brake lugs off as new school brakes work much better(and brake block alignment can be a pain.) It`ll be reducer cups on the headtube next and running them with shafted stems & 1" forks

stidds · « **Reply #5 on:** June 06, 2011, 12:16 PM »

This is my retro Quadangle.... with no oldschool parts at all. Not all newschool has to look newschool, it all depends on the work you put in to make it look different.

popedante · « **Reply #6 on:** June 06, 2011, 12:34 PM »

Stidds , this is one of my favourite builds on the site terrific in chrome & blue

Threaders · « **Reply #7 on:** June 06, 2011, 01:28 PM »

Some great examples there guys. The chrome and blue is lovely and still has that ols school look as well as the blue and gold one pictured above. The red black and gold one is very nice but doesn't look old school enogh for me

I reckon I am definatly going to get one. Alans have them in, but only the tan ones left with blue forks. Might be worth stripping it and sending it to superbike dan, what do you guys think??
I am thinking of blue frame, forks and bars, everything else white, with white tuffs?
Thanks for the the help and the pics. Cheers, Jonathan.

1mancity2 · « **Reply #8 on:** June 06, 2011, 01:50 PM »

Examples here http://bmxmuseum.com/gsearch?cx=partner-pub-9978559632129470%3A4vwnszmdovj&cof=FORID%3A9&ie=UTF-8&q=se+quadrangle&sa=&siteurl=bmxmuseum.com%2F#1000

Threaders · « **Reply #9 on:** June 06, 2011, 03:13 PM »

So, does anyone know if the geometry is different between the quadangles in the 80's and the ones reissued in 2008? The new ones seem slightly longer to me

baldbmxer · « **Reply #10 on:** June 06, 2011, 03:19 PM »

The reissue Quads are long compared with the OS Quads, modern lengths and angles

Threaders · « **Reply #11 on:** June 06, 2011, 03:46 PM »

I thought so. I think thats what is making me think twice about them, although the last two pictured on this thread look great. Have to have a think. Cheers

AKGOFF · « **Reply #12 on:** June 06, 2011, 04:36 PM »

Heres my 3 in order of preference
1979 STR-1 - Beautiful to look at and ride

1983 Quadangle - Beautiful to look at, not so nice to ride though

2008 Retro 'Quadangle' Looptail - Great rider

I don't know about geometry or sizes i just know what looks good and to me thats what matter more.
Cheers
Adam

HEYWOOD BMX · « **Reply #13 on:** June 06, 2011, 04:50 PM »

New`uns should ride better and fit (esp if you`re taller) Have you considered a 90s alloy Quad 'meticulous and Dingo both have/had them.
http://bmxmuseum.com/forums/viewtopic.php?id=202770

oldtired · « **Reply #14 on:** June 06, 2011, 05:02 PM »

nice that one Stidds

didn't know you could get em in real chrome

( sproggs ask that round my way" is that real chrome that bike mister ? how much was it? "

)

Threaders · « **Reply #15 on:** June 06, 2011, 05:45 PM »

Nice one AKGOFF that really helps. Its got to be the 1983 one for me, looks a stunner. Just a shame that that will probably be the most expensive

Looks like I will be sticking to old skool after all. Thanks

QUADROPHENIA · « **Reply #16 on:** June 06, 2011, 06:02 PM »

buy a complete if you go new school otherwise it wont be hard to do a grand on it

AKGOFF · « **Reply #17 on:** June 06, 2011, 06:13 PM »

Quote from: QUADROPHENIA on June 06, 2011, 06:02 PM

buy a complete if you go new school otherwise it wont be hard to do a grand on it

You get what you pay for in anything and if your budget allows custom build everything

Robbo · « **Reply #18 on:** June 06, 2011, 06:25 PM »

http://www.alansbmx.com/product_info.php?cPath=116_86&products_id=6414

Could be a cheap build if you have all the parts to swap over from another bike....

Threaders · « **Reply #19 on:** June 06, 2011, 07:55 PM »

Thats what has sparked this thread off, seeing them on there for 150 pounds. I thought if there wasn't much difference, I would definatly go for it, but now I am not sure.
I love the old school, thats my problem

Jaymz · « **Reply #20 on:** June 06, 2011, 07:58 PM »

Quote from: Robbo on June 06, 2011, 06:25 PM

http://www.alansbmx.com/product_info.php?cPath=116_86&products_id=6414

Could be a cheap build if you have all the parts to swap over from another bike....

jeez that is cheap,

QUADROPHENIA · « **Reply #21 on:** June 06, 2011, 08:19 PM »

they been £150 for ages cos they aint selling

Jaymz · « **Reply #22 on:** June 06, 2011, 08:38 PM »

Quote from: QUADROPHENIA on June 06, 2011, 08:19 PM

they been £150 for ages cos they aint selling

do you think its because of the colour, or the fact they aint the real thing?

Munnyella · « **Reply #23 on:** June 06, 2011, 08:51 PM »

Quote

do you think its because of the colour, or the fact they aint the real thing?

I reckon both of the above, and the fact that you get a complete (albeit in red/gold/black, still not a good combo!) for £280!!

The price was my main reason for getting mine, and the fact that it was the first step in quickly getting a rider again after the `apres Christmas' shed emptying session by the Leicester low life!

I still prefer my 2004, non retro 4130 quad, (In my bikes) but will like the red one better when it loses the redness and the `asian wedding' shade of gold (no disrespect to indian gold, great in its place, but it aint on a quad!).

It will look more `old school' when I can justify it!!