gfxgfx
 
logo
 
gfx gfx
gfx
975806 Posts in 138943 Topics by 6363 Members - Latest Member: V6 DOW November 25, 2024, 08:36 AM
*
gfx* Home | Portal | Forum | Merchandise | Help | Login | Register | gfx
gfx
RADBMX.CO.UK  |  Technical & Reference Section  |  Tech and Restoration  |  Defining a Different Model / Generation
gfx
gfxgfx
 

Author Topic: Defining a Different Model / Generation  (Read 481 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

greentoad

  • Guest
Defining a Different Model / Generation
« on: January 02, 2007, 01:28 PM »
Hi all

I have been working on a new theory for quite a while.

What are your opinions on different models / generations.

When can you classify one component different from another. Is it by number, shape, colour etc and does it have to be a large or small change?

Wikipedia - a generation can refer to stages of successive improvement in the development of a technology

Oxford - of a more advanced stage of technology than previous models or systems

Opinions please.

Thanks

J.

Offline CD17

  • Berm Worm
  • ***********
  • Posts: 10488
  • Rated:
Re: Defining a Different Model / Generation
« Reply #1 on: January 02, 2007, 02:40 PM »
I would say when there is a noticable change in Design, if you were to take the Haro Master, there would be a lot of defferent models & some look the same until you look closer.

Take the 84 model, these all look very simular, but there are small changes.

Then there was a big change when the 85 Master came out.

But if you compare the 84 Master to say a late 80s early 90s with the Bashgard they don't even look close.

RADBMX.CO.UK  |  Technical & Reference Section  |  Tech and Restoration  |  Defining a Different Model / Generation
 

gfxgfx
gfx gfx
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal