Author Topic: should people be able to ruine threads (Read 8171 times)

JT71 · « **Reply #125 on:** October 14, 2009, 08:04 AM »

Quote from: pickle on October 14, 2009, 07:54 AM

Please put me down for this stupid fooking BMX SALE then.......ffs!

think i'm missing something here....

neiljonarcus · « **Reply #126 on:** October 14, 2009, 08:06 AM »

Quote from: pickle on October 14, 2009, 07:54 AM

Please put me down for this stupid fooking BMX SALE then.......ffs!

LOVE OWT LIKE THIS ME

pickle · « **Reply #127 on:** October 14, 2009, 08:09 AM »

not that stupid fooking saying again!

it was funny the first, maybe second time......but tired and boring now.

but put me down for membership yeah?

neiljonarcus · « **Reply #128 on:** October 14, 2009, 08:11 AM »

Quote from: pickle on October 14, 2009, 08:09 AM

not that stupid fooking saying again!

it was funny the first, maybe second time......but tired and boring now.

but put me down for membership yeah?

P M S L

moanjam · « **Reply #129 on:** October 14, 2009, 08:36 AM »

love owt like this me ,

pickle · « **Reply #130 on:** October 14, 2009, 08:53 AM »

oh please stop it.........you're killing me..........no please stop!

dialledbikes · « **Reply #131 on:** October 14, 2009, 01:32 PM »

What do the voting options mean?

If the question is "should people be allowed to ruin threads?", if I vote "Agree" does that mean I agree they should be allowed to ruin threads, or I agree that they shouldn't be allowed to ruin threads?

Jt · « **Reply #132 on:** October 14, 2009, 01:57 PM »

should people be allowed to ruine threads.

agree, meaning yes, you agree, people should be allowed to ruine threads, was my take

i dont know what ruine means, so i agreed incase its good and i'm missing out

i've since found out its latin for ruin, and i love owt like that anyway.

latin eh?

neils full of suprises