0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
What kind of censorship is that? someone brought Burner's into the debate... they got a slagging...!! I stood up for them....
but who in all honesty thought that Dibly was financing this all by himself? surely that would be a niave view? so Avocet backed him....why should them backing him automatically make a product shyte? okay so Coyote don't exactly light the world up with their products, but i for one used to have one of their hard tail MTB frames and it rode well sweet! in fact better than a lot of over priced brands that i've had the pleasure of riding.Avocet gave him the backing.....but from what i know, Dibly owns the rights to the name and designs....all avocet owned was a stake in the company, is that such a bad thing?if i were Dibly, i'm not so sure i would rush to come on here and defend myself to what would seem a huge bunch of people that were sat there waiting to come out and say"i told you so" if fact if that's all they were saying that would be fine......but a lot of people (and i'm not pointing any fingers at individuals here) seem to be getting very close to personal slander in my view.
after struggling to read through all the internet hype,palava and bullshit my conclusions reside thus,dibly made a naive mistake by jumping feet first onto the "lightweight" bandwagon with the revolution frame then struggled to justify the design decision to go with the lb3.? pound frame weight when it came to the technical questions regarding to the frame weight and strength,