gfxgfx
 
logo
 
gfx gfx
gfx
975822 Posts in 138946 Topics by 6374 Members - Latest Member: Boults December 26, 2024, 04:09 AM
*
gfx* Home | Portal | Forum | Merchandise | Help | Login | Register | gfx
gfx
RADBMX.CO.UK  |  Technical & Reference Section  |  Tech and Restoration  |  Torker 280 V 280X
gfx
gfxgfx
 
« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Torker 280 V 280X  (Read 525 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Gnasher

  • Guest
Torker 280 V 280X
« on: October 30, 2008, 10:30 PM »
Can anyone tell me what was the difference between the 280 and the 280X? ???
Logged

mark 2

  • Guest
Re: Torker 280 V 280X
« Reply #1 on: October 30, 2008, 10:33 PM »
1" :daumenhoch:
Logged

Offline crazycraig

  • BMX Nerd
  • *********
  • Posts: 4628
  • Rated:
Re: Torker 280 V 280X
« Reply #2 on: October 30, 2008, 10:34 PM »
one was a frame set and one was a full bike x .They were called a 280 coz they cost $280 .....
Logged
Old School BMX only
Cash is King
Your not famous because you have a BMX so dont expect me to lick your arse for bits !!! I will leave that to the sheep
Jim'll fix it did loads for charity

Offline R Al

  • Rockwalk
  • ***
  • Posts: 581
  • Rated:
Re: Torker 280 V 280X
« Reply #3 on: October 30, 2008, 11:22 PM »
Alan's sold them both as full bikes the 280X being slightly longer just before they brought the PRO x out, I think that was sold as a frameset only.
Logged

Offline Bob_Acid

  • Team Admin
  • BMX Overlord
  • *
  • Posts: 17364
  • It's Bronked
  • Rated:
Re: Torker 280 V 280X
« Reply #4 on: October 31, 2008, 03:07 AM »
What Mark said, the 280 was an inch shorter than the X. The frame and forks only option was called the LP/X
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
RADBMX.CO.UK  |  Technical & Reference Section  |  Tech and Restoration  |  Torker 280 V 280X
 
gfxgfx
gfx gfx
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal