gfxgfx
 
logo
 
gfx gfx
gfx
975808 Posts in 138943 Topics by 6371 Members - Latest Member: Robertflamn November 27, 2024, 01:29 AM
*
gfx* Home | Portal | Forum | Merchandise | Help | Login | Register | gfx
gfx
RADBMX.CO.UK  |  Mid School BMX (>87) 1989 to 2003 (<05)  |  Mid School ( Keep the faith )  |  challenger year id
gfx
gfxgfx
 

Author Topic: challenger year id  (Read 1496 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

bmxbert

  • Guest
challenger year id
« on: October 28, 2008, 03:32 PM »
just got this from museum and should be in post from us by tomorrow. any idea what year it is as ive not seen them without canti mounts.

go it for £217 shipped with profile cranks and 1" pitches







baldbmxer

  • Guest
Re: challenger year id
« Reply #1 on: October 28, 2008, 04:01 PM »
Thats a treat  :daumenhoch: I loves a Challenger me

any excuse to show mine of  :coolsmiley:  a NOS pro with the price still on it!





« Last Edit: October 28, 2008, 04:03 PM by baldbmxer »

Offline harris

  • Founding Fathers
  • Hoffman's Love Child
  • *
  • Posts: 23607
  • Rated:
Re: challenger year id
« Reply #2 on: October 28, 2008, 04:03 PM »
nice buy that    :daumenhoch:

rory

  • Guest
Re: challenger year id
« Reply #3 on: October 28, 2008, 04:16 PM »
nice score, im sure alex can put a date the frame

bmxbert

  • Guest
Re: challenger year id
« Reply #4 on: October 28, 2008, 04:21 PM »
thanks im looking forward to seeing it. any idea what year it is????
my collection is getting better all the time i really want to end up with a collection of best of each large company from the 90s.
im in need of a nice 1" chrome sta to put into my collection!!!!!!!!! :daumenhoch:

Offline harris

  • Founding Fathers
  • Hoffman's Love Child
  • *
  • Posts: 23607
  • Rated:
Re: challenger year id
« Reply #5 on: October 28, 2008, 04:26 PM »
i sold this fnf a few months back to steve but its a great frame set


bmxbert

  • Guest
Re: challenger year id
« Reply #6 on: October 28, 2008, 04:37 PM »
that looks really nice. i wasnt always a lover of these frames but think its because i hadnt seen one without canti mounts.

never liked canti brakes think they ugly. ssshh dont tell anybody. :laugh:

Lazarou

  • Guest
Re: challenger year id
« Reply #7 on: October 28, 2008, 06:11 PM »
Get the seller to give you the serial number.

Philbert had one of these around 96 i think, that's the date i'd put on it 95/96  :-\

Offline Zippy

  • 900 Air
  • ********
  • Posts: 3947
  • Rated:
Re: challenger year id
« Reply #8 on: October 28, 2008, 06:16 PM »
Here's a bad picture of mine.



It's slowly being built at the moment.

What headset would you recoment. I was leaning towords a Chris King but don't know if that's too bling. :-\

SaMAlex

  • Guest
Re: challenger year id
« Reply #9 on: October 28, 2008, 07:38 PM »
I have an S&M Cataloge from 1994 that shows 1" Challengers with canti mounts so the non canti ones are earlier than that.

Also, those aint pitchforks, they are challeger forks. Sort of the same as "pre-pitchforks" as they have thinner legs and a single piece steer tube. They were avalable with single and double thick dropouts.

Very nice frame and forks you got there.  :daumenhoch:

baldbmxer

  • Guest
Re: challenger year id
« Reply #10 on: October 28, 2008, 08:12 PM »

What headset would you recoment. I was leaning towords a Chris King but don't know if that's too bling. :-\
[/quote]

Late Challenger but still really really REALLY nice  :daumenhoch:

Dont lean towards a King headset, reach out and grab one! they're great! and fine on one of those

Offline Philbert

  • Look Back
  • *****
  • Posts: 1204
  • Rated:
Re: challenger year id
« Reply #11 on: October 28, 2008, 08:45 PM »
the one i had was originally purchased in 95 by the first owner.

forks lasted a week and the frame stressed after two. a gusset was brazed in and it carried on for a couple of years

that owner then went through 4 dirt bikes through 95 - 97 and still rides and s&m today

bsdforever

  • Guest
Re: challenger year id
« Reply #12 on: October 29, 2008, 11:02 AM »
I'm pretty certain that's a 1993 challenger

Miko

  • Guest
Re: challenger year id
« Reply #13 on: October 29, 2008, 12:43 PM »
Also, those aint pitchforks, they are challeger forks. Sort of the same as "pre-pitchforks" as they have thinner legs and a single piece steer tube. They were avalable with single and double thick dropouts.

Also known as "Bitchforks".  I was talking to the seller of that frame.  He wouldn't give me a price.  Did you just throw money at him until he sold?

bmxbert

  • Guest
Re: challenger year id
« Reply #14 on: October 29, 2008, 01:22 PM »
no the frame was for sale on bmx museum and i gave gave him his asking price.

thanks alex for the info on forks. im well chuffed with that little purchase.
i was so happy with my savings i bought munners trm to.
this weeks been expensive musnt tell the woman :-X

dialledbikes

  • Guest
Re: challenger year id
« Reply #15 on: October 29, 2008, 09:18 PM »
I think those Challengers first surfaced around late-92/93.  The one Zippy has (Joe's old one) was much later.

If anyone is looking for a complete OS legal Challenger I'd consider selling mine as I don't plan to race OS anymore.

teamsano

  • Guest
Re: challenger year id
« Reply #16 on: October 29, 2008, 10:56 PM »
thats a 93 challenger i'd say. are the dropouts single or two sandwiched together?

RADBMX.CO.UK  |  Mid School BMX (>87) 1989 to 2003 (<05)  |  Mid School ( Keep the faith )  |  challenger year id
 

gfxgfx
gfx gfx
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal