Author Topic: '85 Haro Sport (Read 3224 times)

gmac · « **on:** November 23, 2005, 08:26 PM »

Got the Z-rims on that Jay sent me last week. I've taken off the Tuffs to use on something else, but I think the Z's look sweet with the whitewalls.

Need to source some better brakes, and maybe change the chainwheel for a spider. I'm not too keen on the solid ones. I'd like some better condition pedals too, but they are DX's on there, so they'll stay for now.

I fitted Master decals instead of Sport ones, purely because I prefer the colour. My bike, my choiceÂ

Plenty more projects on the go, so I'll try and get some more pics up soon.

Cheers

Guy Â

lazychubs · « **Reply #1 on:** November 23, 2005, 08:47 PM »

nice i do love white walls on black wheels
and wot are those grips as i need some slim ones for turben lite lol

stuntmaster · « **Reply #2 on:** November 23, 2005, 09:05 PM »

nice don`t see many chrome sports ,is it original chrome

ORB · « **Reply #3 on:** November 23, 2005, 09:11 PM »

Is it not an 84 sport?

looks sweet though

showtime · « **Reply #4 on:** November 23, 2005, 09:23 PM »

gotta agre with you about the fusion chainring, its a little on the hideous side!
sweet looking bike apart from that

i don't really like any of the 1 piece chainrings (apart from the early Redline Flite one of course

) i prefer the look of a Power Disc! even the name of it sounds tough LOL

gmac · « **Reply #5 on:** November 23, 2005, 09:34 PM »

Chubs - They are 'Haro Bikes' grips

Stuntmaster - yes, it is original chrome, and it's in pretty good condition too, with minimal wear.

Orb - you could be right chap, I'm no expert. As far as I'm concerned, the earlier the better.

Bob_Acid · « **Reply #6 on:** November 24, 2005, 11:13 AM »

wrap around and top tube gusset? it's not an 84 Sport.

theRuler · « **Reply #7 on:** November 24, 2005, 11:35 AM »

nice looking haro you got there!!!

this is an 84 though

not sure what yours is
not an 84, and it doesnt look like an 85. could be much later!!!

Zippy · « **Reply #8 on:** November 24, 2005, 11:57 AM »

It's definetly not an '84 and most definetley not an '85. Could be '87 or '88. Top tube kind of gives it away.

Moose · « **Reply #9 on:** November 24, 2005, 12:54 PM »

I think it's early 90's. That style top tube for the Sport came in after '89. Don't know when - but after.

JAY · « **Reply #10 on:** November 24, 2005, 01:02 PM »

92ish i reckon ,but not 100%.

theRuler · « **Reply #11 on:** November 24, 2005, 01:04 PM »

thats what i thought!

nice bike though. i think we will need a serial and some closeups to identify this beasty!

gmac · « **Reply #12 on:** November 24, 2005, 01:19 PM »

'90 - '92 ??

Oh well, I've got a gen1 coming, so not the end of the world

I'll get a serial no, later on. Any particular close up ??

theRuler · « **Reply #13 on:** November 24, 2005, 01:21 PM »

dropouts (f+r) and gussets i reckon!!!

gmac · « **Reply #14 on:** November 24, 2005, 08:15 PM »

This one looks a bit earlier ....

Yeah, I know the forks are backwards, I just dragged it out of the shed.Â

CD17 · « **Reply #15 on:** November 24, 2005, 08:52 PM »

Yeah, I know the forks are backwards, I just dragged it out of the shed.

So what is this doing in the shed ?

Why is it not in the house

Bob_Acid · « **Reply #16 on:** November 24, 2005, 08:53 PM »

the 90 in the serial number might be telling us something. It's a nice bike though, you don't see them very often the masters are quite common but not the sport.

The 2nd bike looks more like an 84