Author Topic: Torker 280's what where the difference (Read 1091 times)

dj_benice · « **on:** September 29, 2007, 03:29 PM »

Have an 83 torker serial tjj8396 oval gussett anybody know how to tell if it is 280 or 280x

Is it as simple as the x's had an x at end of serial?

crazycraig · « **Reply #1 on:** September 29, 2007, 03:31 PM »

Ring alan he knows why

Dark Diggler · « **Reply #2 on:** September 29, 2007, 04:24 PM »

TT length denotes the difference i think $:-\$

but craig is right, mr woods will know

bodamus · « **Reply #3 on:** September 29, 2007, 05:33 PM »

I don't think there is a difference I think I read that the X was just a higher spec as a complete bike $:-\$

bodamus.

dj_benice · « **Reply #4 on:** September 29, 2007, 07:18 PM »

Quote from: bodamus on September 29, 2007, 05:33 PM

I don't think there is a difference I think I read that the X was just a higher spec as a complete bike $:-\$

bodamus.

Yup read that the 280 was so called as cost $280 (from alans website)and that the 280x was better specced wasn't sure if that was all, now to decide which decals

mark 2 · « **Reply #5 on:** October 07, 2007, 01:19 AM »

There were 3 bikes in the 1982 Torker range when these came out - the 280, a smaller version of the 280 and the 280X. The 280X was the pro model and an inch longer than the 280.....

crazycraig · « **Reply #6 on:** October 07, 2007, 07:44 AM »

http://www.jgh-concepts.co.uk/BMXresto.htm

so if your building it to factory spec its a 280x if custom its a 280 .

Gary72 · « **Reply #7 on:** October 07, 2007, 08:35 AM »

I had the smaller version which was a Magnum 200 again so called I think because of the price tag like the 280, had round gusset hole. If anyone has one with a IG11 postcode stamped on the bottom???

Dark Diggler · « **Reply #8 on:** October 07, 2007, 09:10 AM »

Quote from: mark j. on October 07, 2007, 01:19 AM

There were 3 bikes in the 1982 Torker range when these came out - the 280, a smaller version of the 280 and the 280X. The 280X was the pro model and an inch longer than the 280.....

dj_benice · « **Reply #9 on:** October 08, 2007, 10:01 AM »

Quote from: mark j. on October 07, 2007, 01:19 AM

There were 3 bikes in the 1982 Torker range when these came out - the 280, a smaller version of the 280 and the 280X. The 280X was the pro model and an inch longer than the 280.....

Any idea what the diff TT lengths where Mark?

mark 2 · « **Reply #10 on:** October 08, 2007, 04:56 PM »

Haven't a clue on the TT length but this might be of interest.....

Bob_Acid · « **Reply #11 on:** October 08, 2007, 05:38 PM »

The frame and fork only option was LP/X. i think you'll find the top tubes were 18 and 19? there was an inch difference anyway. my 86 280x is 19.5 though.

On another note check out craigs link to Juilans site there. Prices on stuff? 25 nicker for MX1000s

Author Topic: Torker 280's what where the difference (Read 1091 times)

dj_benice

Torker 280's what where the difference

crazycraig

Re: Torker 280's what where the difference

Dark Diggler

Re: Torker 280's what where the difference

bodamus

Re: Torker 280's what where the difference

dj_benice

Re: Torker 280's what where the difference

mark 2

Re: Torker 280's what where the difference

crazycraig

Re: Torker 280's what where the difference

Gary72

Re: Torker 280's what where the difference

Dark Diggler

Re: Torker 280's what where the difference

dj_benice

Re: Torker 280's what where the difference

mark 2

Re: Torker 280's what where the difference

Bob_Acid

Re: Torker 280's what where the difference