SE 2006 website up

[Dingobmxer]

http://www.sebmx.com/2006/index.asp
I am still undecided if I like them or not?
  DINGO

[rom_kid_04]

i like the ripper team but all the others are nasty

[motomagII]

i got an se broce race and it is okay for the cash not bad and well made but it is from 1999/2000 so not sure who made it really .

[sam hudson]

 
i know i go on about this but i love my 2005 Ripper,its a really good bike...simple as 
Have a go of one(if you can find one).They are given a lot of unfair stick because of the brand sale in 97.

[Bob_Acid]

quad pro looks like the exact frame as my 04, landing gear look even thinner which don't bode well since mine have twisted.

[showtime]

yeah that seems a bit crap! the original Landing Gear were the thickest forks we'd ever seen at the time & they built a reputation around that!
its a shame we only get a watered down version nowadays! they are the same in name only

[Bob_Acid]

oww i quite like the blue team ripper though and is they're same price as last year looks like a good bike 4 the money

[sam hudson]

The landing gear on my 2005 Ripper are identical to the landing gear on my 84 Ripper dimension wise and materials wise so nothing 'watered down' about them,but i agree that the 2006 Quad Gear looks a bit puny...cant imagine twisting them..you must have been doing some serious stuff. Ow

[Bob_Acid]

erm...no

[retrorider.u.k]

look ok to me

[Bob_Acid]

I've got LG max on my 99 Ripper and they are deffo meatier than the ones on my Quad, which are beefier then the standard race fork

beefier, meatier?

[Dingobmxer]

you hungry Bob
  DINGO

[sam hudson]

Thats worrying if you didnt give em any stick and they twisted.I dont think i could bend my LG's if i tried.You would think that they would be extra beefy on a quad...it was always the one to thrash as opposed to the Ripper.
I'd cry if i were you.