Author Topic: bad product word association (Read 9964 times)

darkersomeday · « **Reply #25 on:** June 13, 2007, 12:04 AM »

se racings marketing

darkersomeday · « **Reply #26 on:** June 13, 2007, 12:05 AM »

tim march's nob

Lazarou · « **Reply #27 on:** June 13, 2007, 12:07 AM »

darkersomeday · « **Reply #28 on:** June 13, 2007, 12:11 AM »

antix

TwoBobRob · « **Reply #29 on:** June 13, 2007, 12:40 AM »

Quote from: christhejob on June 12, 2007, 11:32 PM

hoffman condor (sorry, but it's true!!!!!)

You've gotta give us more than that..... why is the condor worthy of this thread?

Come on. Spill.

Lazarou · « **Reply #30 on:** June 13, 2007, 12:57 AM »

S&M Kris Bennett

TwoBobRob · « **Reply #31 on:** June 13, 2007, 01:02 AM »

King Forks.

Lazarou · « **Reply #32 on:** June 13, 2007, 01:08 AM »

Can't have that Rob! What was wrong with King forks? come on! outside!

darkersomeday · « **Reply #33 on:** June 13, 2007, 01:12 AM »

the terrible1 barcode

TwoBobRob · « **Reply #34 on:** June 13, 2007, 01:18 AM »

Quote from: Lazarou on June 13, 2007, 01:08 AM

Can't have that Rob! What was wrong with King forks? come on! outside!

Hehehehe.......

Thought that might provoke a reaction from someone

I never understood the difference between snapping forks at the steerer tube and snapping a frame off at the headtube. Either way you're going straight to faceplant. All as I could see was a difference in cost. Back then, Â£300 a frame or so? Would have bought a lot of pitchforks......

christhejob · « **Reply #35 on:** June 13, 2007, 07:40 AM »

THE original condors
pegmounts
geometry
a BEAST

christhejob · « **Reply #36 on:** June 13, 2007, 07:41 AM »

1991/92 haro kneesavers... not fit to carry a shopping bag

SaMAlex · « **Reply #37 on:** June 13, 2007, 09:16 AM »

Quote from: Lazarou on June 13, 2007, 12:57 AM

S&M Kris Bennett

I had one of them for a while, mainly cos BSD Grant told me it was good. It was a total beast, I didnt like the droopy wishbone and the dropouts were too big.

It wasnt THAT bad tho!

SaMAlex · « **Reply #38 on:** June 13, 2007, 09:19 AM »

Quote from: TwoBobRob on June 13, 2007, 01:18 AM

I never understood the difference between snapping forks at the steerer tube and snapping a frame off at the headtube. Either way you're going straight to faceplant. All as I could see was a difference in cost. Back then, £300 a frame or so? Would have bought a lot of pitchforks......

Stuart was riding a full on standard Lengthy at the worlds in germany in 94ish. He was using king forks and he folded the whole front end of the lengthy on the massive spine ramp. It was a time when braking bike parts was big news, but no-one seemed to make that big a deal of it. I never thought Id see an early standard frame fold in half like an 80s frame.

Stodgy · « **Reply #39 on:** June 13, 2007, 09:40 AM »

Quote from: christhejob on June 12, 2007, 11:32 PM

hoffman condor (sorry, but it's true!!!!!)

Lazarou · « **Reply #40 on:** June 13, 2007, 09:50 AM »

Quote from: S&MAlex on June 13, 2007, 09:16 AM

Quote from: Lazarou on June 13, 2007, 12:57 AM
S&M Kris Bennett

I had one of them for a while, mainly cos BSD Grant told me it was good. It was a total beast, I didnt like the droopy wishbone and the dropouts were too big.

It wasnt THAT bad tho!

Maybe it wasn't bad as i never rode one, I just thought it was ugly.

SaMAlex · « **Reply #41 on:** June 13, 2007, 10:01 AM »

Quote from: Lazarou on June 13, 2007, 09:50 AM

Quote from: S&MAlex on June 13, 2007, 09:16 AM
Quote from: Lazarou on June 13, 2007, 12:57 AM
S&M Kris Bennett

I had one of them for a while, mainly cos BSD Grant told me it was good. It was a total beast, I didnt like the droopy wishbone and the dropouts were too big.

It wasnt THAT bad tho!

Maybe it wasn't bad as i never rode one, I just thought it was ugly.

The Haro style top tube to wish bone really didnt help, I hated that. It looked like the back end of the frame was sagging. I also didnt like the massive wishbone at the BB. Oh, and I didnt like the decals but I was able to change them.

yoda · « **Reply #42 on:** June 13, 2007, 10:11 AM »

Wilkerson airlines frames........they Just looked soooooooooooo heavy and wrong!

SaMAlex · « **Reply #43 on:** June 13, 2007, 10:13 AM »

Wilkerson airlines forks! I think they hit the ground if you cornered to sharp.

harris · « **Reply #44 on:** June 13, 2007, 10:20 AM »

that lengthy that folded ,could be why they put the outer strength plates on ,like on mine.
back to topic - ultimate hardware products

generallee · « **Reply #45 on:** June 13, 2007, 04:48 PM »

Dirt Master. Ashley, 12 , barspin.

darkersomeday · « **Reply #46 on:** June 13, 2007, 04:57 PM »

bmx rider

christhejob · « **Reply #47 on:** June 13, 2007, 05:16 PM »

these KHE barends i saw... two bolts and two rawl plugs!!!!!!!

TwoBobRob · « **Reply #48 on:** June 13, 2007, 06:26 PM »

Quote from: christhejob on June 13, 2007, 07:40 AM

THE original condors
pegmounts
geometry
a BEAST

Fair enough. They were flawed. An icon, nevertheless

christhejob · « **Reply #49 on:** June 14, 2007, 06:30 PM »

it came to me on the way home... stuff that's meant to be good but was so so bad

THE HERRINGTON CRUSADER

Author Topic: bad product word association (Read 9964 times)

darkersomeday

darkersomeday

Lazarou

darkersomeday

Lazarou

Lazarou

darkersomeday

christhejob

christhejob

SaMAlex

SaMAlex

Lazarou

SaMAlex

yoda

SaMAlex

darkersomeday

christhejob

christhejob