gfxgfx
 
logo
 
gfx gfx
gfx
975755 Posts in 138933 Topics by 6360 Members - Latest Member: TattooedYorkie September 22, 2024, 04:27 PM
*
gfx* Home | Portal | Forum | Merchandise | Help | Login | Register | gfx
gfx
RADBMX.CO.UK  |  Technical & Reference Section  |  Tech and Restoration  |  Spoke sizes no need for calculations
gfx
gfxgfx
 

Author Topic: Spoke sizes no need for calculations  (Read 1047 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

dj_benice

  • Guest
Spoke sizes no need for calculations
« on: September 03, 2006, 10:53 PM »
http://www.bikewebsite.com/spokes.htm seems cool to me will let you know how accurate when I try lacing my 20 x 1 3/8 to low flange with 218mm's

theRuler

  • Guest
Re: Spoke sizes no need for calculations
« Reply #1 on: September 04, 2006, 09:03 PM »
thats well handy
good looking out dj_b

Sanmarcopizza

  • Guest
Re: Spoke sizes no need for calculations
« Reply #2 on: September 04, 2006, 09:42 PM »
Intereting. I had 3 sets of 20" wheels made up with low flange hubs spoked 3 cross. The spokes were 188mm. The chart here says 189mm, so I guess there must be a mm or 2 either way because a nipple is quite long, eh ?

spinmaster

  • Guest
Re: Spoke sizes no need for calculations
« Reply #3 on: September 04, 2006, 10:18 PM »
depends how you like your nipples

dj_benice

  • Guest
Re: Spoke sizes no need for calculations
« Reply #4 on: September 04, 2006, 10:19 PM »
sadly anodised and aluminium ;D

spinmaster

  • Guest
Re: Spoke sizes no need for calculations
« Reply #5 on: September 04, 2006, 10:23 PM »
not long and floppy then :LolLolLolLol:

Offline Steve P

  • 900 Air
  • ********
  • Posts: 3045
  • Rated:
Re: Spoke sizes no need for calculations
« Reply #6 on: September 04, 2006, 10:26 PM »
Great link . . . will save time measuring ERD's and flange dimensions too

I prefer a small flange before anyone asks  ;D

Steve

spinmaster

  • Guest
Re: Spoke sizes no need for calculations
« Reply #7 on: September 04, 2006, 10:29 PM »


I prefer a small flange before anyone asks  ;D



don't we all,  :LolLolLolLol:

dj_benice

  • Guest
Re: Spoke sizes no need for calculations
« Reply #8 on: September 04, 2006, 10:31 PM »
yes I to small flange, hell no to long n floppy!!!!!! thats my role ;D

Offline MartyC

  • Berm Worm
  • ***********
  • Posts: 8755
  • Radder than a Rad thing on a Rad day; maybe?
  • Rated:
Re: Spoke sizes no need for calculations
« Reply #9 on: September 04, 2006, 10:31 PM »
Great link . . . will save time measuring ERD's and flange dimensions too

I prefer a small flange before anyone asks  ;D

Steve

I'm not so sure Steve, I've had a look in the museum and there looks to be a lot of large flanges with your name on them  :LolLolLolLol:


Better to crash and burn than fade away

Offline Steve P

  • 900 Air
  • ********
  • Posts: 3045
  • Rated:
Re: Spoke sizes no need for calculations
« Reply #10 on: September 04, 2006, 10:35 PM »
I'm not so sure Steve, I've had a look in the museum and there looks to be a lot of large flanges with your name on them

Okay, I confess . . . I don't mind a large flange once in a while . . . gotta have a good seal though  ;D  ;D

Offline MartyC

  • Berm Worm
  • ***********
  • Posts: 8755
  • Radder than a Rad thing on a Rad day; maybe?
  • Rated:
Re: Spoke sizes no need for calculations
« Reply #11 on: September 04, 2006, 10:38 PM »
I'm not so sure Steve, I've had a look in the museum and there looks to be a lot of large flanges with your name on them

Okay, I confess . . . I don't mind a large flange once in a while . . . gotta have a good seal though  ;D  ;D

So what you're saying is a large flange is OK so long its a tight fit?  :LolLolLolLol:


Better to crash and burn than fade away

dj_benice

  • Guest
Re: Spoke sizes no need for calculations
« Reply #12 on: September 04, 2006, 10:42 PM »
perverts the lot of you what has happened to this thread  :2funny:  :2funny:  :2funny:  :2funny:  :2funny:  :2funny:  :2funny:  :2funny:  :2funny:  :2funny:  :2funny:  :2funny:  :2funny:

Offline Steve P

  • 900 Air
  • ********
  • Posts: 3045
  • Rated:
Re: Spoke sizes no need for calculations
« Reply #13 on: September 04, 2006, 10:47 PM »
So what you're saying is a large flange is OK so long its a tight fit?

Not found one yet Marty but still looking . . . NOS or ex-show :2funny:

Right, back to the spokes then . . . . . !!!

theRuler

  • Guest
Re: Spoke sizes no need for calculations
« Reply #14 on: September 04, 2006, 10:55 PM »
any flange will do

RADBMX.CO.UK  |  Technical & Reference Section  |  Tech and Restoration  |  Spoke sizes no need for calculations
 

gfxgfx
gfx gfx
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal