0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
I have honestly never lost money on parts for 2 reasons.. 1st is that I don't buy run of the mill parts that cost shit loads of money, 2nd reason is that I don't buy stuff with the thought of selling it on again.
Quote from: stidds on May 21, 2014, 11:07 PMI have honestly never lost money on parts for 2 reasons.. 1st is that I don't buy run of the mill parts that cost shit loads of money, 2nd reason is that I don't buy stuff with the thought of selling it on again.Some of us don't have a choice though Sean. I would keep all my bikes if I had the space. Keeping hold of 4 main bikes is about my limit. The rest get built and ridden, moved on so I can build something else. I love to build but, I also love to ride them. I want to do that before I shut down so waiting 5 years for say, a set of pedals to come along cheap, is out of the question Saying that though, I don't get pulled into stupid payouts although, I have been ripped by a few on here during my stay
If everyone is building the same bikes with the same parts then said parts will be thin on the ground and therefore expensive . Why not build something less mainstream ? I appreciate that rippers , haro's , quads and TA 's are nice but they all seem to get built the same with all the same parts .I myself am to fookin tight to gentlemans relish £400 , £500 on some cranks or £200 on some pedals just so my bike can be the same as everybody else's . Don't get me wrong , if this is your deal I'm not knocking you or your bikes it's just my opinion .
anyone want to buy the air from my inner tubes for £500, it's original Raleigh you know
What I don't get, and here's where it gets contentious, is if like in Terry's example, you buy something, ride it, use it or whatever, why should you then expect to sell it at the price you paid for it? Isn't it just the way of the world that most things depreciate with use?