0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
...but Ed will keep on nagging then
Do we have a generation defining mid school bmx ?
may I sugest 2 catagories for mid school to end this debate forever...early mid school 86-91late mid school 91-96bumbum!
I blame the BMXsociety on all this nonsense who AFAIK come up with years to define the sections to facilitate their BOTY competition.
Quote from: rodriguez on February 03, 2014, 02:10 PMI blame the BMXsociety on all this nonsense who AFAIK come up with years to define the sections to facilitate their BOTY competition. But this site has a BOTY also and at MK we have S&S, so because of this we have to have the years of each 'school' clearly defined. Otherwise people start throwing their toys out of their prams.The easiest way in my opinion is this, keep it as it is a everybody STFU about it.
Old / Mid / And new school are obsolete. Sticking to it forces all of BMX history to conform to three categories, and we all know BMX has been defined by more that 3 major shifts in its direction.It should just be defined by the era, 70's, 80's, 90's, etc, etc.Not a hope in hell that a 86 bike can sit along side a 2000 bike and both be called "mid".
Quote from: fischflo on February 02, 2014, 11:11 PM...but Ed will keep on nagging then Does anybody really listen to Ed?
but by then non of us will give a fook....