Author Topic: one for the GT experts (Read 2387 times)

rollin72 · « **on:** January 09, 2013, 10:35 PM »

what kind of stamp would a early 80's GT layback have, just got 1 but the stamp doesnt look right, is this a late/early 90's stamp?

bobbbbsy · « **Reply #1 on:** January 09, 2013, 10:38 PM »

that bloody gary turner must have his name stamped on more seatposts than Mr min insert (whoever he is )

Gnarlyscoots · « **Reply #2 on:** January 09, 2013, 10:38 PM »

The early stuff is circle stamped bro. That is definately 90's stamping you got there

NORTY40 · « **Reply #3 on:** January 09, 2013, 10:39 PM »

I ain't no expert Gaz but that isn't a early 80's stamp imo

I have a set of early performer bars and a early GT seatpost and they both have this stamp on ....

rollin72 · « **Reply #4 on:** January 09, 2013, 10:42 PM »

bollocks, was told it was an 83 post, there's some fookin snakes out there

Peter J · « **Reply #5 on:** January 09, 2013, 10:43 PM »

Quote from: bobbbbsy on January 09, 2013, 10:38 PM

Mr min insert

Thats my wifes pet name for me

Gaz looks late 90's to me

80's logo is the "coin" one

bobbbbsy · « **Reply #6 on:** January 09, 2013, 10:43 PM »

its probably mid to late 90s !"
looks like the generic gt mtb text $:-\$

neil · « **Reply #7 on:** January 09, 2013, 10:45 PM »

early gt stuff has no stamp and bars are unknurled,the coin style stamp is 87 ish and the gt letter stamp is mid 90s i belive call me a muggy c**t if im wrong

NORTY40 · « **Reply #8 on:** January 09, 2013, 10:45 PM »

Quote from: rollin72 on January 09, 2013, 10:42 PM

bollocks, was told it was an 83 post, there's some fookin snakes out there

not only is it the wrong stamp but are you saying it's a snakepost aswell Gaz

moneyback time i reckons or you send in the Salford mafia

bobbbbsy · « **Reply #9 on:** January 09, 2013, 10:48 PM »

pm costa costa costos !

Devilock · « **Reply #10 on:** January 09, 2013, 10:49 PM »

Quote from: neil on January 09, 2013, 10:45 PM

early gt stuff has no stamp and bars are unknurled,the coin style stamp is 87 ish and the gt letter stamp is mid 90s i belive call me a cnut if im wrong

neil · « **Reply #11 on:** January 09, 2013, 11:35 PM »

Quote from: Devilock on January 09, 2013, 10:49 PM

Quote from: neil on January 09, 2013, 10:45 PM
early gt stuff has no stamp and bars are unknurled,the coin style stamp is 87 ish and the gt letter stamp is mid 90s i belive call me a cnut if im wrong

Gnarlyscoots · « **Reply #12 on:** January 09, 2013, 11:50 PM »

I was lead to believe that the coin stamping is from 1985. There are many variations on bars, Coin with Knurling, Coin without Knurling, Knurling without Coin etc...

The early 80 - 84 bars are unstamped but some are unstamped with a single strip of knurling.

I was also lead to believe that the block lettering came in around 92 onwards.

Is that right $:-\$

Badbaldie · « **Reply #13 on:** January 10, 2013, 12:06 AM »

Quote from: rollin72 on January 09, 2013, 10:42 PM

bollocks, was told it was an 83 post, there's some fookin snakes out there

your not wrong there Gaz , some right con men around at the moment. were or who did you get the post of mate ?

bobbbbsy · « **Reply #14 on:** January 10, 2013, 12:25 AM »

at least you did nt buy this. look at the cutting out on the sticker !!

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Old-School-GT-Lay-Back-Seat-Post-Brand-New-Standard-22mm-Bmx-Size-/251209636330?pt=UK_sportsleisure_cycling_bikeparts_SR&hash=item3a7d42d9ea

That Swan Guy · « **Reply #15 on:** January 10, 2013, 01:06 AM »

what neil said

neil · « **Reply #16 on:** January 10, 2013, 01:13 AM »

Nice one Nick

Gnarlyscoots · « **Reply #17 on:** January 11, 2013, 05:29 PM »

Quote from: nickswan1 on January 10, 2013, 01:06 AM

what neil said

Any conformation on this Nick??

Sid1972 · « **Reply #18 on:** January 11, 2013, 06:51 PM »

Your not the first to get screwed on that worse when it comes via rad....

Devilock · « **Reply #19 on:** January 11, 2013, 06:58 PM »

Quote from: Sid1972 on January 11, 2013, 06:51 PM

Your not the first to get screwed on that worse when it comes via rad....

Elucidate...

Sid1972 · « **Reply #20 on:** January 11, 2013, 07:02 PM »

Quote from: Devilock on January 11, 2013, 06:58 PM

Quote from: Sid1972 on January 11, 2013, 06:51 PM
Your not the first to get screwed on that worse when it comes via rad....

Elucidate...

Eh?

Devilock · « **Reply #21 on:** January 11, 2013, 07:07 PM »

Quote from: Sid1972 on January 11, 2013, 07:02 PM

Quote from: Devilock on January 11, 2013, 06:58 PM
Quote from: Sid1972 on January 11, 2013, 06:51 PM
Your not the first to get screwed on that worse when it comes via rad....

Elucidate...

Eh?

Explain, expand, etc...

That Swan Guy · « **Reply #22 on:** January 11, 2013, 10:12 PM »

Quote from: Londonhellboy on January 11, 2013, 05:29 PM

Quote from: nickswan1 on January 10, 2013, 01:06 AM
what neil said

Any conformation on this Nick??

Wrong font for that period.

Devilock · « **Reply #23 on:** January 11, 2013, 11:51 PM »

Quote from: nickswan1 on January 11, 2013, 10:12 PM

Quote from: Londonhellboy on January 11, 2013, 05:29 PM
Quote from: nickswan1 on January 10, 2013, 01:06 AM
what neil said

Any conformation on this Nick??

Wrong font for that period.

I dont think Terry is referring to the initial inquiry but rather the info stated by Neil.