0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Devilock on October 04, 2012, 09:16 AMSo have you an estimated build cost?By the looks of the list... around 8.5k
So have you an estimated build cost?
Quote from: steve69 on October 04, 2012, 09:32 AMQuote from: Devilock on October 04, 2012, 09:16 AMSo have you an estimated build cost?By the looks of the list... around 8.5k You've gotta be kidding. I wouldn't need to pay that on a fully loaded Intense M9.
Nice one,silly bollocks!! Cant wait to kick the wheels in..
Beautiful f/f & awesome result on the bars. Looking forward to seeing this built.Did they use aerospeeds on cruisers in 85 ?
What the hell is an 'Fully loaded Intense M9'?
Quote from: glynnyboy on October 04, 2012, 04:04 PMBeautiful f/f & awesome result on the bars. Looking forward to seeing this built.Did they use aerospeeds on cruisers in 85 ?Think Glynn means that by 1985 it had been worked out that aerospeeds were rubbish and no one was using them.At that time most cruiser riders were the BIG guys,aerospeeds were pretty fragile.
Quote from: AKGOFF on October 04, 2012, 04:33 PMWhat the hell is an 'Fully loaded Intense M9'?Something like this
Adam....... Some inspiration
Is that a racing mountain bike?
Quote from: AKGOFF on October 04, 2012, 05:11 PMIs that a racing mountain bike?Yeah, it replaces the M6 (which i had). Do the build chrome & black...!
Adam I made it out as a question because I haven't done enough home work on it to give a fully educated answer.The points rooski made were actually what was running through my mind though.Gen 3 profiles and 401's I know were strong enough and being used but I wasn't sure on aerospeeds .As Andy said I know the cruiser riders were the big guys and their crank choices reflected that.(As I started to find out when looking into it a little recently )
Bit more advice for you Adam.. Give the bike to steve69