Author Topic: Dont be so stupid (Read 1161 times)

Devilock · « **on:** August 09, 2012, 09:24 PM »

Gnarlyscoots · « **Reply #1 on:** August 09, 2012, 09:31 PM »

The first one is a genuine '86 seat Rich. A little high but it is a minter

The second one is a re-pop. That's why he won't show the underneath

Devilock · « **Reply #2 on:** August 09, 2012, 09:56 PM »

I know what they are ya bumba clart!!

Its a bit silly & I was bored...!

pickle · « **Reply #3 on:** August 09, 2012, 10:01 PM »

He lists it as NOS and then states it came off a gold hutch build

Then that ain't Fooking NOS then is it!

skki3330 · « **Reply #4 on:** August 09, 2012, 10:10 PM »

He lists it as NOS and then states it came off a gold hutch build Then that ain't Fooking NOS then is it!

2nd that

Dont the just fooking wind you up

Gnarlyscoots · « **Reply #5 on:** August 09, 2012, 10:19 PM »

I know what they are ya bumba clart!!

Its a bit silly & I was bored...!

Ya ras clarting batty 'ole

Cleedubber · « **Reply #6 on:** August 09, 2012, 11:32 PM »

He lists it as NOS and then states it came off a gold hutch build Then that ain't Fooking NOS then is it!

My thoughts exactly
Dated 1986 and it was part of a build in 1984 .....

ThisBitterPill · « **Reply #7 on:** August 10, 2012, 07:45 AM »

May be a dumb question, but how come the original one doesn't have the 'Aero' on the side....?

robert paine1 · « **Reply #8 on:** August 10, 2012, 07:50 AM »

Both look repop to me..

ED209 · « **Reply #9 on:** August 10, 2012, 08:14 AM »

hark at the Jamaicans on here

deeman · « **Reply #10 on:** August 10, 2012, 05:34 PM »

Both look repop to me..

what i was thinking!why does the original not have aero on side too??