I maybe wrong but these look like Prolines to me???

[adenough]

http://www.ebay.com/itm/1980s-Old-School-REDLINE-Flight-Cranks-Single-Pinch-180-Crankset-/330691321395?pt=Cycling_Parts_Accessories&hash=item4cfebd1e33#ht_2752wt_1110

[RATTY]

The Pro lines are single pinch, and fatter than flites

[adenough]

check out the spindle, flights only use 6 splines?

[RATTY]

deff pro lines, I mistakingly bought a set of these when I first started back

[adenough]

me too

[mattfx81]

Yep prolines for sure.

[lk_97]

Yep, they're prolines

[pickle]

How much do Prolines normally go for then? 

[Munnyella]

about the same second hand, no idea new.

EDIT

The ones i've seen recently, fairly new ones have been going for similar money to twin pinchers.

I don't know how long prolines have been around for, are the ones ^^ up there^^ old ones?

MM

[Mattdub]

Yep , Prolines . Fatter arms & bigger decals indents 

[BENDYCAT ELEVENTEEN]

But they still look nice - just flight got that top name going 

[punkdSICO]

But they still look nice - just flight got that top name going 

Yeah, they do still look nice.

I have some single pinch ProLines (cost £90 in here with BB) and they do almost look like 400s (to the untrained); its just a shame they are noticably wider to my twin pinch Profiles.  Where they join the spindle, they are 34mm vs 30mm of the Profiles.

It seems if you had the single pinch of the ProLines and, the arm width of the Twin pinched Profiles, you would then have the perfect 400s replicas! 

I actually prefer the overall look of the Twin pinch Profiles due to the thinner arms..

Paul

[boofy44]

i had a set of those about 6 years ago.i've messaged the seller,wait and see if he does anything about it.