How big do 24" comp3 2.125's look?

[wildon]

I know it's a stupid question .. but are they a lot fatter than 1.75's when mounted?  I dont think there is much in the difference of 1.5 and 1.75's.
Who's using them?
Cheers 

[Gary72]

Yes, They look FAT

[Gary72]

Not the best pic, But you can see the difference. I do have a spare set if your after some

[wildon]

cheers Gary, yeah they are a lot bigger 
I dont need any thanks mate... i was after a 1.75 set but i just seen some 1st gen yellow labels for sale in 2.125 .. don't fancy them that large though 

[GT world]

Je wiz those do look fat...I like what you done with the redline

Im in the middle of old schooling a 99 SGX

Out of interest can these be obtained in tan walls of any description?
   Neil

[baldbmxer]

cheers Gary, yeah they are a lot bigger 
I dont need any thanks mate... i was after a 1.75 set but i just seen some 1st gen yellow labels for sale in 2.125 .. don't fancy them that large though 

I have a couple of yellow labelled 2.125 Comp 3's and they are huge!

[Jon The Bassist]

Yep they're huge BUT ones with different coloured walls (ie skin, gum, tan) look less quite large, IMO of course.

[MartyC]

I think they look OK with a skinwall, here's my GT24 with 2.125 front and 1.75 rear...

[double chevron]

They look well fat, especially with an MX900 caliper!

[Mattdub]

BIIIG ...............

Fine on the front but would look daft ( IMO ) on the rear 

[diesel]

I always run a fat front:







       

[MartyC]

I'm with you Dan in the main, I love a fat one up front but my Vector just looks great with a skinny one up front 

Funny that you can't write that in a way that does not have any innuendo in it 

[Jt]

i like svelte tyres.

i like running 1.5's on my 20's..they look nicer.

1.75 on the cruiser.

[GT world]

Hey those skinwalls look great...where do i find a new pair? 

[Dark Diggler]

i like running 1.5's on my 20's..they look nicer.

Bikes are for riding, not looking at 

[M5AT]

Fat is good, fat is sexy

[Bob_Acid]