gfxgfx
 
logo
 
gfx gfx
gfx
975825 Posts in 138946 Topics by 6376 Members - Latest Member: The Carrot Cruncher December 27, 2024, 10:10 PM
*
gfx* Home | Portal | Forum | Merchandise | Help | Login | Register | gfx
gfx
RADBMX.CO.UK  |  Technical & Reference Section  |  Tech and Restoration  |  se racing seatpost question....
gfx
gfxgfx
 

Author Topic: se racing seatpost question....  (Read 1680 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

waza04

  • Guest
se racing seatpost question....
« on: April 05, 2011, 08:05 PM »
hi peeps, i was looking through a few old adverts regarding the old rippers, and found one telling you about do's and dont's..... i noticed one had information regarding using the drop out savers and all that to protect them, and then noticed in small writing, it said do not use a fluted aluminium seat post,  :-\  does any1 know why this is? i know laybacks were a deffo no no, but thought a straight one would be ok. any help appreciated. cheers  :daumenhoch:

Offline 58 delray

  • Site Supporter
  • 900 Air
  • *
  • Posts: 3483
  • Rated:
Re: se racing seatpost question....
« Reply #1 on: April 05, 2011, 08:11 PM »
first off not sure if fluted posts came in 13/16ths but if they did i would imagine the reason would be that A) not enough surface area in the seat tube and B) ally to ally fusion  :daumenhoch:

waza04

  • Guest
Re: se racing seatpost question....
« Reply #2 on: April 05, 2011, 08:27 PM »
first off not sure if fluted posts came in 13/16ths but if they did i would imagine the reason would be that A) not enough surface area in the seat tube and B) ally to ally fusion  :daumenhoch:

cheers for that dude...... i had one turned down to 13/16th, better get some lube down there.  :shocked:

Offline HARORIDER

  • Look Back
  • *****
  • Posts: 1781
  • Rated:
Re: se racing seatpost question....
« Reply #3 on: April 05, 2011, 08:33 PM »
first off not sure if fluted posts came in 13/16ths but if they did i would imagine the reason would be that A) not enough surface area in the seat tube and B) ally to ally fusion  :daumenhoch:

strange as the retro rippers come with just that :-\ thicker post though :daumenhoch:

Offline hunterdubber

  • Site Supporter
  • Berm Worm
  • *
  • Posts: 13121
  • Rated:
Re: se racing seatpost question....
« Reply #4 on: April 05, 2011, 09:20 PM »
It's Aluminium to cro-mo you get the fusion  ::)


or alu to alu as well ?  ???

Offline 58 delray

  • Site Supporter
  • 900 Air
  • *
  • Posts: 3483
  • Rated:
Re: se racing seatpost question....
« Reply #5 on: April 05, 2011, 09:23 PM »
It's Aluminium to cro-mo you get the fusion  ::)


or alu to alu as well ?  ???
ally to ally as well

Offline rooski

  • 540 Air
  • *******
  • Posts: 2616
  • Mons Veneris
  • Rated:
Re: se racing seatpost question....
« Reply #6 on: April 05, 2011, 09:32 PM »
If ally aint anodised it can react with the other part,causing seizing.
also if the two parts are a tight fit it can "pick up" on the other part,so as you try to pull/twist it apart it will get tighter and seize :(
i always use copper grease when installing ally parts,headsets,bbs etc :daumenhoch:

RADBMX.CO.UK  |  Technical & Reference Section  |  Tech and Restoration  |  se racing seatpost question....
 

gfxgfx
gfx gfx
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal